Tech Support Blog

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, 24 February 2009

Hard Object Weirdness (or Don't Count On Bugs)

Posted on 10:19 by Unknown
ATTR_hard is the OBJ attribute that makes the geometry of an object mesh interact with X-Plane's physics engine.  ATTR_hard object has a long history of weird behavior, and its behavior in X-Plane 930 is no exception.

The History
  • Before X-Plane 815, hard surfaces acted horizontal regardless of the actual OBJ geometry.
  • From X-Plane 815-922, sloped hard surfaces work as expected, but vertical hard surfaces do not work.  Animation is ignored for hard surfaces.
  • Starting with X-Plane 930, animation commands affect hard surfaces.  However, vertical surfaces still do not work, and an animated surface does not create friction under the plane.  
(In other words, if you put the plane on a platform and move the platform horizontally, the plane will be pulled with the platform due to friction between the platform and the wheels.)

In all of these cases, what we have is a limited implementation that doesn't correctly capture all expected behaviors.  Why don't we have a better implementation?  There are two factors.
  1. In some cases a more correct implementation might take significantly more CPU power. It is important that we not raise the CPU requirements of X-Plane mid-version run.
  2. In some cases, we simply don't have a better implementation coded yet.  Remember that X-Plane is primarily a flight simulator.  My pilot friends tell me that it is bad form to collide the airplane with anything during flight.  So the goal of OBJ collisions is more to detect poor flying than to correctly model the resulting aftermath.  X-Plane is not GTA4!
What Do You Do With a Buggy Feature?

Very simple: don't use it if you can avoid it!  I don't mean "don't use ATTR_hard" - it has legitimate uses.  Rather I mean: don't depend on the buggy behavior as a feature.

For example, before 930, animation would affect the drawn but not physical OBJ.  I would say that given that bug, the only safe thing to do is to not animate hard objects.  Animating hard objects to take advantage of the schism between drawing and physics would be assuming that the bug will stay buggy forever.

What Can You Do Now?

In X-Plane 930 hard object animation is a lot better than it used to be, but still not quite correct.  The remaining limitations are:
  • There is no friction.  If you move a platform horizontally, the plane is not dragged along. So you can't really build horizontal elevators.  (You can build a platform that moves vertically and move the plane around that way.)
  • There is still not support for vertical hard surfaces.  Like before, to make a solid "wall", make the wall thick and make the top of the wall hard.  But bear in mind that the collision detection in this case is catastrophic; your plane will be heavily damaged by even minor contact with the wall.  X-Plane doesn't support horizontal collisions right now.
  • Hard surfaces are ignored for vehicles.  If you are replacing the car set, don't add hard surfaces - it might turn out that some future implementation does look at them - if that happened, how would you know what the CPU hit is?
Even given this limitation, you can now make a building with limited access controlled by animation; using a "deck" for the roof and a hard surface for the tops of the walls and the doors (which are animated) you can control access.

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in modeling | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Pixel Shaders and Moore's Law
    In my post on 64-bit computing and X-Plane, there's a point that's implicit: there is a cost (in development time) to adopting any ...
  • Hierarchy and WED
    I just finished fixing some bugs in WED regarding the hierarchy view. (To get a sense of what a hierarchy view is like, try AC3D...) In WED...
  • Is Bigger Always Better?
    We've been preaching "one big texture, not lots of little textures" for a while now, and generally speaking, packing a lot of ...
  • Systems Modeling and Physics Modeling
    In past blog posts I have tried to contrast two very different different approaches to simulation, which I would loosely call: "Predic...
  • How Framerate Dies - Glitching
    Back in the good old days (that would be X-Plane 6), X-Plane's framerate would suffer in two ways as you cranked up the rendering option...
  • The X-Desktop and iPhone Are Not Zero-Sum Games
    On the menu this morning: first a whiny rant, then a nerdy one. Someone pointed me at this post. Before I go into my geeky diatribe about l...
  • Clean Airport Layouts
    I have blogged about correct airport layouts before, but let me bring the point up again, because it is so important: You must create struc...
  • So How Big of a Mesh Can You Build?
    I get asked about the maximum mesh density in X-Plane a lot. First, I must note that X-Plane's mesh is adaptive - the triangles are not ...
  • What is a panel region?
    X-Plane 9 introduces a new OBJ feature: panel regions. The basic idea is this: In X-Plane 8 you could use the 2-d panel as a texture in you...
  • Why Do Custom Lights Use the Object Texture?
    I am trying to be disciplined and put documentation on the X-Plane wiki , and limit the blog to announcements, rants, and explanations of wh...

Categories

  • absurdly cute
  • Air Traffic Control
  • aircraft
  • Android
  • animation
  • announce
  • cockpits
  • documentation
  • drivers
  • file formats
  • global scenery
  • Goofy Screenshots
  • hacks
  • hardware
  • hobbies
  • inside x-plane
  • installer
  • ipad
  • iphone
  • legal
  • localization
  • modeling
  • off topic
  • palm pre
  • panels
  • performance
  • plugins
  • political
  • scenery system
  • tools
  • X-Plane 10
  • XSquawkBox

Blog Archive

  • ►  2011 (12)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (11)
  • ►  2010 (111)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (10)
    • ►  September (9)
    • ►  August (12)
    • ►  July (8)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (13)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (11)
    • ►  February (12)
    • ►  January (11)
  • ▼  2009 (130)
    • ►  December (16)
    • ►  November (11)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (16)
    • ►  August (12)
    • ►  July (11)
    • ►  June (9)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (10)
    • ►  March (9)
    • ▼  February (9)
      • Separate Specular Hilites and Per-Pixel Lighting
      • Hard Object Weirdness (or Don't Count On Bugs)
      • VOR Range
      • When To Cut a Beta
      • The Dangers of Wandering in the Desert
      • Scripting: A Line In the Sand
      • X-Plane 930 Beta
      • Catalyst Drivers - Get 9-1
      • Stuff I'm Looking At
    • ►  January (16)
  • ►  2008 (147)
    • ►  December (18)
    • ►  November (10)
    • ►  October (7)
    • ►  September (11)
    • ►  August (15)
    • ►  July (9)
    • ►  June (14)
    • ►  May (9)
    • ►  April (14)
    • ►  March (13)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (21)
  • ►  2007 (100)
    • ►  December (17)
    • ►  November (13)
    • ►  October (13)
    • ►  September (9)
    • ►  August (17)
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (9)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (3)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile