Tech Support Blog

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Sunday, 2 March 2008

Hardware Profiles

Posted on 06:49 by Unknown
X-Plane 9 currently recognizes (roughly) three categories of graphics hardware:
  • Non-Pixel-Shader hardware (GeForce 2,3,4, Radeon 7000-9200)
  • First-Generation Shader Hardware (GeForce FX 5nnnn, Radeon 9500-9800, X300-X600)
  • Later-Generation Shader Hardware (GeForce 6, 7, 8, Radeon X200, Radeon X700+)
That first bucket is pretty simple: those cards don't support programmable pixel shaders (as we know them today) and can't run any shader effects. The "use pixel shaders" check box doesn't appear in the rendering settings.

The distinction between the later two is a little bit more subtle. Basically the first generation of pixel shader cards (the 9700 and friends) support only 96 instructions for each pixel shader; this puts us right on the edge of sometimes not being able to draw all of our effects; we have to simplify the water slightly to make it work. The next generation of chips (X850 and friends) doesn't have this limitation.

By comparison, while NVidia cards have been able to handle long shaders from day one, the GeForce 5's shader performance is really poor.

So we bucket all of these chips as "first-gen". When we detect this we:
  • Simplify shaders slightly (gets us out of trouble with the 9700).
  • Don't default to shaders being on when the sim is first booted (because the framerate will probably be unusably slow).
Even though the 9700 provided very usable shader performance in its day, by the standards of modern GPUs, this older chip isn't that fast, so it's probably for the best that we not enable reflective water by default on machines with these cards.

By comparison, X-Plane deals with almost all other capabilities on an a-la-carte basis; particualr features are enabled if the right menu of hardware features is available. We do this to try to deal more flexibly with the wide variety of cards that are out there. Some examples:
  • You'll get hardware accelerated runway lights if your card supports pixel shaders and sprites (virtually all shader-enabled cards have sprites).
  • You'll get sun-glare effects if your card supports pixel counting (virtually all modern cards can do this).
  • The non-pixel-shader rendering code will show more detail if your card supports more texture units (this is only an issue with very old hardware).
I've been looking over hardware profiles a lot lately, and I suspect that the next big "jump" in hardware will be the DX10-compliant cards (GeForce 8, Radeon HD). There's a lot of fine print in what the various cards can do between all of the pre-DX10 cards; at some point when we decide what menu of features we'll require for rendering, we need to simplify.

My guess is that when we start to have "really advanced" pixel shaders that require hardware more sophisticated than what we need now, we'll simply require a DX10 card. Otherwise we'll have to sort through 8 different profiles of fine print, only to attempt to partially support cards that probably won't be fast enough anyway.

(That is to say, a feature is only useful for us if it can run reasonably quickly. It doesn't make sense for us to try to make a special "simplified" version of a rendering feature for, say, the X850 if every X850 is going to turn it off every time for framerate reasons.)

If any of this turns into hardware buying advice, I suppose it would be this:
  • If you are deciding between a DX10 and DX9 card (e.g. between the HD2400 and X1900, or GeForce 8600 vs 7900) go for the newer generation DX10 ards (HD or GeForce 8); if the card has decent performance you'll also be setting yourself up for future features.
  • As always, pay attention to the fine print of the model numbers, particularly the configuration. Lower model number cards basically have fewer parallel components than higher number ones and that leads directly to lower framerate.
I see an add online for the GeForce 8500 for $70 and 8600 for $90. But if you look at the links below, you'll see that the 8500 has only half the shaders of the 8600 - that's going to be a huge performance difference for $20.

(So the moral of this story is: try to get an HD or GeForce 8 card, but don't dip into the really low end cards because they're stripped down too far for X-Plane use.)

These pages (NV, ATI) on Wikipedia list specs for a whole pile of cards and can be useful to decode the fine print.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in hardware, performance | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Pixel Shaders and Moore's Law
    In my post on 64-bit computing and X-Plane, there's a point that's implicit: there is a cost (in development time) to adopting any ...
  • Hierarchy and WED
    I just finished fixing some bugs in WED regarding the hierarchy view. (To get a sense of what a hierarchy view is like, try AC3D...) In WED...
  • Is Bigger Always Better?
    We've been preaching "one big texture, not lots of little textures" for a while now, and generally speaking, packing a lot of ...
  • Systems Modeling and Physics Modeling
    In past blog posts I have tried to contrast two very different different approaches to simulation, which I would loosely call: "Predic...
  • How Framerate Dies - Glitching
    Back in the good old days (that would be X-Plane 6), X-Plane's framerate would suffer in two ways as you cranked up the rendering option...
  • The X-Desktop and iPhone Are Not Zero-Sum Games
    On the menu this morning: first a whiny rant, then a nerdy one. Someone pointed me at this post. Before I go into my geeky diatribe about l...
  • Clean Airport Layouts
    I have blogged about correct airport layouts before, but let me bring the point up again, because it is so important: You must create struc...
  • So How Big of a Mesh Can You Build?
    I get asked about the maximum mesh density in X-Plane a lot. First, I must note that X-Plane's mesh is adaptive - the triangles are not ...
  • What is a panel region?
    X-Plane 9 introduces a new OBJ feature: panel regions. The basic idea is this: In X-Plane 8 you could use the 2-d panel as a texture in you...
  • Why Do Custom Lights Use the Object Texture?
    I am trying to be disciplined and put documentation on the X-Plane wiki , and limit the blog to announcements, rants, and explanations of wh...

Categories

  • absurdly cute
  • Air Traffic Control
  • aircraft
  • Android
  • animation
  • announce
  • cockpits
  • documentation
  • drivers
  • file formats
  • global scenery
  • Goofy Screenshots
  • hacks
  • hardware
  • hobbies
  • inside x-plane
  • installer
  • ipad
  • iphone
  • legal
  • localization
  • modeling
  • off topic
  • palm pre
  • panels
  • performance
  • plugins
  • political
  • scenery system
  • tools
  • X-Plane 10
  • XSquawkBox

Blog Archive

  • ►  2011 (12)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (11)
  • ►  2010 (111)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (10)
    • ►  September (9)
    • ►  August (12)
    • ►  July (8)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (13)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (11)
    • ►  February (12)
    • ►  January (11)
  • ►  2009 (130)
    • ►  December (16)
    • ►  November (11)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (16)
    • ►  August (12)
    • ►  July (11)
    • ►  June (9)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (10)
    • ►  March (9)
    • ►  February (9)
    • ►  January (16)
  • ▼  2008 (147)
    • ►  December (18)
    • ►  November (10)
    • ►  October (7)
    • ►  September (11)
    • ►  August (15)
    • ►  July (9)
    • ►  June (14)
    • ►  May (9)
    • ►  April (14)
    • ▼  March (13)
      • DataRefs, the Cirrus, and Opt-In
      • Road Overlays and Draping
      • You Can't Replace Objects in Liveries
      • More Threads - the Installer
      • When Will X-Plane Stop Saying It Is Beta?
      • The Global Scenery Folder
      • Scenery Tools Release
      • X-Plane 9: What Comes Next
      • Version 9 - Probably Too Late
      • Installer Theory
      • Fun With Installers
      • Don't use ATTR_cockpit outside the cockpit objects
      • Hardware Profiles
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (21)
  • ►  2007 (100)
    • ►  December (17)
    • ►  November (13)
    • ►  October (13)
    • ►  September (9)
    • ►  August (17)
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (9)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (3)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile